Controversies in Cardiovascular Anesthesia [antikvár]

preface On 16 October 1846, an itinerant New England dentist named William T.G. Morton proved the anesthetic effect of diethyl ether in a public demonstration in the "ether dome" of the Bulfinch Building of the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. The patient, Gilbert Abbott, suffered no pain, and the surgeon, Dr. John C. Warren, was able to complete a suture ligature of a vascular tumor of the jaw without the hurry that until then was so neccssary. The operation proved a failure, since the tumor recurred; but the demonstration of ether's anesthetic effcct was a great success. Operative pain was conquered, and surgery could advance from a crude and unscientific practicc where speed was paramount, and the major body cavities could not be entered, into the unique blend of scicnce and art that it is now. "Gentlemen, this is no humbug," supposedly muttered Warren, perhaps the last noncontroversial assessment of anesthesiology to be made by a surgeon. The screams of resisting patients in pain were stilled, and quiet entered the operating room for the first time. But the new science of pain relief was quickly wrapped in controversy. An argument immediately arose as to who could legitimately claim primacy for the discovery. Morton's attempt to hide the true nature of his anesthetic agent, coupled with an effort to patent the discovery, clouded his reputation and stimulated other claimants to push themselves forward. The anesthesiologists of Georgia still honor the memory of Crawford Long, while the people of Boston maintain the controversy with a monument in the Public Garden, dedicated to the discovery of ether anesthesia, yet bearing the name of no one.