Bővebb ismertető
Foreword
The availability and quality of data from population health surveys in Europe have greatly
improved over the last 10-15 years, particularly in the countries of central and eastern
Europe. The survey approach is now fully recognized to be a valuable method for health
monitoring that is complementary to the registration approach. Nevertheless, the
comparability of health survey data remains a challenge. Difficulties arise from two main
sources: "man-made" variations between surveys owing to methodological differences (for
example, in the way that indicators and health conditions are defined) and "natural"
differences between populations caused by varying attitudes, behaviour and concepts of
health. Moreover, it is not always possible to reliably identify and separate the two.
The establishment of agreed standards in terms of recommended common methods and
measurement instruments can largely improve control of the first main source of
incomparability and, at the same time, increase the relevance and reliability of survey data.
This has immediate benefits for public health practice, as we continuously make
international comparisons to provide evidence for health policies. In the long term,
however, we must reach beyond international harmonization of instruments: we must
greatly improve the scientific understanding of the causes of any significant
incomparability of health surveys between countries.
These tasks are impossible without sincere international collaboration, with careful
consideration of the similarities and differences among health concepts, approaches and
patterns in different countries and organizations. The knowledge derived from such projects
should be used to customize health strategies, models and skills so that they are better
tailored to the specific needs and resources of each country. The special added value of
such research arises from the cross-fertilization of ideas between cultures (including
organizational cultures), the facilitation of multidisciplinary research, and the creation of
links between health research, health policy and the individual citizen. The EUROHIS
project has capitalized on this thinking.
The project has required financial and scientific input from many different sources as
well as a carefully planned programme of work. In particular, the support and generous
financial contribution of the European Commission's Biomedical and Health Research
Programme (BIOMED 2), which has financed the project as a Concerted Action, is
gratefully acknowledged. EUROHIS demonstrates how WHO and the Commission can
work collaboratively to deliver results that have greater impact than if the organizations
worked alone. The project has contributed to the objectives of both organizations. It has
allowed greater cross-cultural diversity and has therefore produced results of more general
validity and relevance. The success of the EUROHIS project is clear, but the full impact of
it will be decided by the use of its recommendations by the public health authorities in the
Member States.