Bővebb ismertető
Foreword
Perhaps the best way to appreciate how robust economic condi-
tions were during the latter half of the 1990s is to recall just how
much time was devoted to analyzing what the end would be like.
The numerous accounts predicting "soft or hard landings" when the
boom times faded had a common quality: they all seemed to reflect an
underlying belief that the prosperity we were experiencing was just
too good to be true. Some called it the Goldilocks economy—not too
hot and not too cold, but just right. Democrats credited the policies
of the Clinton administration, and some Republicans tried to explain
that it was all merely a delayed reaction to the policies of President
Reagan during the 1980s. There may be no simple right answer to the
question of why conditions were so good, but one judgment that
warrants little dispute is that, somehow, a combination of policy and
good fortune produced better economic circumstances for most
Americans.
Indeed, for the foreseeable future, the prosperity that the United
States enjoyed during the last five years of the 1990s is likely to be the
gold standard in terms of economic performance. Growth rates aver-
aged 4.0 percent over that span; productivity increases, which aver-
aged only 1.4 percent from 1973 to 1990, averaged almost twice that
in the second half of the 1990s; unemployment declined from 7.8
percent in 1992 to 4.1 percent by the end of the decade; and inflation,
contrary to prevailing attitudes among economists about what was
possible under such boom conditions, averaged only 2.9 percent for
the period. Of course, the greatest attention was paid to perhaps the